Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):2036-2037, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20234508

RESUMEN

BackgroundVaccination against SARS-CoV2 had a critical role in the fight against COVID19 pandemic.A weaker humoral response to COVID19 vaccine has been found in rheumatic patients treated with Rituximab (RTX) or Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)[1]. Despite the evidence that anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines can elicit a T-cell response [2], some data show that even the cellular immunity could be impaired in rheumatic patients [3] but COVID19 serology is the only parameter that is feasible to measure in daily practice.Tixagevimab+cilgavimab are two human-derived monoclonal antibodies administered parenterally and authorized by regulatory agencies in February 2022 for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against COVID19 from different virus variants in fragile patients.ObjectivesTo demonstrate safety and effectiveness of tixagevimab+cilgavimab.MethodsPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases undergoing immunosuppressive treatment with RTX or MMF during the vaccination campaign were enrolled between April and June 2022. All patients must have anti-spike antibody levels below the protective threshold (defined by anti-spike IgG titre <250 BAU/ml) after receiving at least 2 vaccine doses.Patients were monitored with a questionnaire every month about COVID19 symptoms (including respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, anosmia and ageusia, skin rash and potential contact with COVID19+ subjects) and were checked for anti-spike and anti-nucleocapside antibodies titres every 2 months for a total of a 6 month follow-up. MMF dose was reduced at 1 g/die at the time of vaccine administration.ResultsFifteen patients were enrolled: 9 participants had a connective tissue disease (CTD;1 dermatomyositis, 3 anti-syntethase syndrome, 4 systemic sclerosis, 1 systemic lupus erythematosus) and 6 had vasculitis (all granulomatosis with polyangiitis). 12 of them received RTX in the preceding 12 months and 3 were taking MMF.About safety, the therapy was very well tolerated and only 4 patients (26%) reported a non-severe adverse event in the 2 weeks following drug administration (2 myalgia, 1 headache, 1 fatigue), none of them requiring hospitalization nor pharmacologic treatment.Regarding effectiveness, 3/15 patients contracted SARS-Cov2 infection (20%) with mild symptoms and no need for hospitalization nor oxygen therapy. Only 1 of them received an antiviral drug (nirmatrelvir+ritonavir). All infected patients had a CTD diagnosis. No significant correlation was observed between the type of rheumatic disease and the risk of infection or response to tixagevimab+cilgavimab.ConclusionNone of our patients developed severe adverse events after tixagevimab+cilgavimab administration and, among the 3 SARS-CoV2 infected patients, none required hospitalization nor oxygen therapy.We conclude that in our experience tixagevimab+cilgavimab is a safe and useful complementary immunization strategy to vaccination for COVID19 prophylaxis.These data will be implemented in a larger study, comprehending various immunocompromised patients from several departments.References[1] Furer et al., Ann Rheum Dis, 2021[2] Mangalakumari et al., Nat Rev Immunol, 2020[3] Picchianti-Diamanti et al., Front Immunol, 2021Charateristic of the cohortIdentificativeAgeDiagnosisRTX/MMFSARS-CoV2 InfectionHospitalizationAntiviral drugs180SScMMF-//270ASSDRTX+nono370ASSDRTX+noyes452GPARTX-//551GPARTX-//649SSc+SSjRTX-//768SScMMF-//847LESRTX-//964ASSDRTX-//1068GPARTX-//1123GPARTX-//1258DMRTX+nono1361SScMMF-//1475GPARTX-//1569GPARTX-//Figure 1.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

2.
TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology ; 29(3):377-393, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2080719

RESUMEN

Preventing stress is a primary goal for organizations. To achieve this goal in an effective way, integration between the three levels of intervention — primary, secondary, and tertiary — and between different professional figures is fundamental. A protocol (named OPhy-WRS protocol) has been imple-mented to allow occupational physicians (OPhys) and occupational psychologists (OPsys) to cooperate for secondary and tertiary prevention. The protocol aims to measure anxiety, emotional, and somatic symptoms, and sleep disorders, as well as behavioral responses that can be traced back to work-related stress. The protocol consists in a worksheet compiled by the OPhy as a result of a structured interview to be conducted during healthcare surveillance. Prior to the administration of the protocol, in the perspective of multidisciplinary cooperation, OPhys received training by OPsys. The physicians administered the protocol to 804 employees in a big Italian company. Five hundred eighty-six employees were interviewed before the pandemic outburst, the remaining 218 after March 2020: This condition created two subgroups (pre-pandemic and pandemic) that could be compared. The data obtained are useful to isolate clusters and workers that need further investigation and closer monitoring by occupational physicians. The comparison between the two groups shows a worsened scenario in terms of stress symptoms. © 2022 Cises Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.

3.
European Journal of Public Health ; 31:2, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1610323
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA